![]() ![]() ![]() Continued abuse of our services will cause your IP address to be blocked indefinitely. Please fill out the CAPTCHA below and then click the button to indicate that you agree to these terms. If you wish to be unblocked, you must agree that you will take immediate steps to rectify this issue. If you do not understand what is causing this behavior, please contact us here. If you promise to stop (by clicking the Agree button below), we'll unblock your connection for now, but we will immediately re-block it if we detect additional bad behavior. Overusing our search engine with a very large number of searches in a very short amount of time.Using a badly configured (or badly written) browser add-on for blocking content.Running a "scraper" or "downloader" program that either does not identify itself or uses fake headers to elude detection.Using a script or add-on that scans GameFAQs for box and screen images (such as an emulator front-end), while overloading our search engine.There is no official GameFAQs app, and we do not support nor have any contact with the makers of these unofficial apps. Damnation feats are distinct from more common feats in three ways. Continued use of these apps may cause your IP to be blocked indefinitely. Damnation feats represent a bargain the character has made with some dark power, granting the character great power at the cost of her eternal soul. This triggers our anti-spambot measures, which are designed to stop automated systems from flooding the site with traffic. Some unofficial phone apps appear to be using GameFAQs as a back-end, but they do not behave like a real web browser does.Using GameFAQs regularly with these browsers can cause temporary and even permanent IP blocks due to these additional requests. If you are using the Brave browser, or have installed the Ghostery add-on, these programs send extra traffic to our servers for every page on the site that you browse, then send that data back to a third party, essentially spying on your browsing habits.We strongly recommend you stop using this browser until this problem is corrected. The latest version of the Opera browser sends multiple invalid requests to our servers for every page you visit.The most common causes of this issue are: Sometimes you don't have the luxury of modifying the source code, in which case you should fix the encoding and send a patch to the maintainer.Your IP address has been temporarily blocked due to a large number of HTTP requests. Many times the offending character is in a comment (author's name) in which case you can just modify it to be whatever you want. I seem to run into this problem with open source. Hopefully this can help you to properly encode whatever file you have the clang is choking on. Since 0xF6 is only 8 bits, the first 3 x's in the first byte can be set to 0. The proper encoding of this UCS code point (246 or 0xF6) in UTF-8 is 0xC3 0xB6 which looks like this: 11000011 10110110īecause encoding 0xF6 means taking the lower 6 bits and plugging them into the second byte and the higher 2 bits are added into the first byte. This being the case, 0xF6 followed by something that does not begin with the highest two bits set to 1 and 0 respectively is improperly encoded. Ĭode points that are 8-11 bits in length are encoded in UTF-8 as: 110xxxxx 10xxxxxx Windows 54 alternatives to HxD HxD is a carefully designed and fast hex editor which, additionally to raw disk editing and modifying of main memory (RAM), handles files of any size. Only lower ASCII (7-bit characters) can be encoded as a single character in UTF-8. So, what if your problem character isn't o-umlaut? I've included a list of a few common characters, but you can follow the steps below to find any other UTF-8 encoding to solve your particular problem: | Char | ISO-8859-1 | UTF-8 | So crack open your favorite hex editor and replace the one 0xF6 character with two characters: 0xC3 0xB6. The proper UTF-8 encoding is two bytes: 0xC3 0xB6. However, to properly encode it in UTF-8 you cannot just place 0xF6 in a single byte in your file. I haven't checked the release notes to verify that the new clang requires UTF-8, but I changed my source to have a proper UTF-8-encoded little o-umlaut, and it compiled.ĠxF6 or 246 is the UCS code point for little o-umlaut. ![]() So, it seems that clang from the latest Xcode (4.6) accepts UTF-8 encoding and complains about upper (or extended) ASCII, because upper ASCII for universal character set (UCS) code points according to ISO-8859-1 mixed into your source does not result in proper UTF-8 encoding. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |